Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (83680)	6/17/1999 7:35:00 AM
From: GVTucker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Well, CPQ's much-anticipated preannounced loss is finally reality. It will be interesting to see its effect.

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (83680)	6/17/1999 10:55:00 AM
From: Tony Viola	Respond to of 186894

Mary, IMO there is inevitabilility and that IA64 is unstoppable (Tony's RASmataz schtick not withstanding). There have been sightings of Intel people using the R word, right on this thread! BTW, S390 MTBFs are up into the 10 to 30 years range, without any voting CPU schemes. Tony

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (83680)	6/18/1999 12:27:00 AM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

RE: "Perhaps it's just wishful thinking, but I see parallels with Xeon success in the market and Merced followup with when Windows 3.0 came out in the late 1980's. ... when Xeon came out (signalling Intels intentions in the highend market) it spells the end for all the other companies in the Workstation, Server, and Fault Tolerant markets. IMO there is inevitabilility and that IA64 is unstoppable (Tony's RASmataz schtick not withstanding)." Hi Mary, Nice post. Am looking forward to this happening. Regards, Amy J