Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (53460)	6/17/1999 4:23:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

Well there are a lot of ramifications to allowing the states to decide their own policies in these controversial matters... however, I might be willing to consider it if we extended it to all other areas too, for example, gun control. Say abortion is legal in California and guns are illegal, no one can enter california with a gun, border patrols etc. (I'm fairly sure comprehensive gun control would pass in California). Thats kind of an eye for an eye, I would say, since in both cases we have legislation that huge groups of people find unacceptable.

To: Neocon who wrote (53460)	6/17/1999 5:51:00 PM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 67261

Neocon, the NOW gang doesn't really care about womens rights. They're really about extending the hand of government and moving us toward a socialist state. It was simply an easy way to get a bunch of rabid supporters, and at the same time hide their marxist philosophy. The way they ran underground during the Clinton scandals and looked like a bunch of hypocritical "yes ladies" clinched that one. Bill Clinton exposed the NOW gang for what it really is. That being a radically far left, elitist group of socialists. Who couldn't bring themselves down to support "trailor trash" like Paula Jones, or upset the apple cart by supporting Kathleen Wiley, or Jane Doe number 5. Michael