To: Neocon who wrote (12404 ) 6/18/1999 10:31:00 AM From: GUSTAVE JAEGER Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17770
Neocon, Re: As for the European theater, if Stalin had not made his pact with Hitler, it is possible that Hitler would have accomplished little more than a minor revision of borders. Stalin's perfidy emboldened him to plunge the Continent into war, and the Soviet peoples suffered for it. Sorry but the above is pure bullshit! Adolf Hitler got strong support throughout Europe on the part of a reactionary bourgeoisie who had the willies about Bolchevism... Even for praised-to-the-skies Winston Churchill, Stalin represented a far greater threat to Europe's bourgeois order than Hitler's corporacism. The truth is that the European bourgeoisie made one big, lethal blunder: from Franquist Spain (remember Spain's civil war in 1936) to (Vichyist) France to Belgium to...., European bourgeoisies thought they were in Europe's driver seat and Hitler was just a transitory clown who couldn't realize that he was manipulated. Indeed, the real, scary bete noire at the time was Stalin and Hitler was supposed to be Europe's rampart against the spread of Communism. That's why the Nazi party got all the monies necessary to set up such efficient organizations as the SS, the SA (Assault Sections), etc. I have (original) press articles dated back to the 1930s, including an article from Belgian daily Le Soir dated 1935 which explicitly wonders where did the Fuhrer find the money to thrive in politics and the Belgian journalist hints at oil major Royal Dutch (and its CEO Deterding) as a possible sponsor... It makes sense if you recall the fierce battle that opposed Rockefeller's Standard Oil to Royal Dutch worldwide since the 1900s: the Russian oilfields were already coveted by Western robber barons. Needless to say how painful was the backlash of such a sneaky liar-poker.... Regards, Gustave.