SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (83861)6/18/1999 5:06:00 PM
From: Dennis Conner  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
I am new to watching Intel. There doesn't seem to be much of a response from the company to the recent downgrades. Historically how has Intel responded to such attacks. Does there seem to be any difference in how the current bad press is being handled.



To: Paul Engel who wrote (83861)6/18/1999 7:36:00 PM
From: grok  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
RE: <However, I think their current K6-2 and K6-3 CPUs are already incorporating front-end 0.18 micron modules - so they are gaining some experience with their older products.>

Oh? Are K6 transistors better than 0.25u transistors? If so, then maybe the same is true for K7 and there will be less speed boost when it moves to full 0.18u.



To: Paul Engel who wrote (83861)6/18/1999 10:20:00 PM
From: Doug M.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul, thanks for your efforts. They really help on a day like today.

Doug



To: Paul Engel who wrote (83861)6/18/1999 10:34:00 PM
From: kapkan4u  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
<Paul - re: That's not a problem - a large percentage of Coppermine actually exceeds 600 MHz on room temperature wafer sort - but that degrades with temperature.>

That is interesting. I thought CuMine design was a problem. This sounds more like a process problem to me. Can you elaborate?

Kap.