Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rick Hawke who wrote (21073)	6/19/1999 10:49:00 AM
From: George J. Tromp	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 26850

Than quit whinning, and I would suggest you take advantage of other peoples ignorance, after all isnt that what the market is about, taking from the ill informed and capitalizing on their ability not to recognize value.?? It works very well for me, wonder if I have educated the masses enough, probably not, I will try to do a better job, maybe later. LOL GJT

To: Rick Hawke who wrote (21073)	6/19/1999 10:55:00 AM
From: Digger	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26850

Front page of Edmonton Journal. SPARKLING SAMPLE FROM CAMSELL LAKE BRIGHTENS FUTURE FOR DIAMOND MINE. The article notes 5542 carets from 3004 tonnes, compares global average of about $60 per caret with Winspear's $98.42. Regarding value per tonne, Ekati at $92, Daivik's over 200, one of the top in the world, and Winspear at $181.58, all in US. Randy is quoted as saying funding is not a problem, still $8 million in the bank. Remember all the earlier crap that the high value was bogus because it rested mainly with the big stones? Why the present crap about the low value per caret? This is because there are so many one to three caret stones, the greater number of stones, the LOWER VALUE PER CARET. All of the former crap was based on so few carets, not it is based on too many carets! Show me the reasoning behind this apparent lack of understanding. Don't go losing your money by selling now, you deserve a payoff after this long.

To: Rick Hawke who wrote (21073)	6/19/1999 6:23:00 PM
From: .Trev	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 26850

You've repeated your view often enough for one day thank you. But in case you still feel as underpriveleged as you seem to be let me summarize what I read from your multiple posts. What you seem to be saying is that you think the long term future for Winspear is great and destined to be a producer, but in the meantime would some shareholders please sell and drive down the price so that you can buy bore for less. You don't need to respond and try to cloud the issue more we all know what you're saying.Feel free to go short by the way, we don't want to interfere with your freedom of action. Cheers