SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JRH who wrote (32721)6/19/1999 2:52:00 PM
From: limtex  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 152472
 
JRH -

Thanks for the post. My problem is I guess that what I though was plug and play...just isn't. It's plug, don't play but aggravate instead.

I don't have 100s of Negabytes to back up maybe a couple of hundred and manyof those are caused by Winfax which seems to creat loads of Megabytes just for simple things.

I've been thinking of using SanDisks but I wanted one backup medium and maybe the new mini drives will do the trick. They don't have to be as tough as SanDisks and they can stay at home nice and quite and I don't care how much power they consume because I'm in the quite and tranquil home environment.

Still th Zip is very dissapointing. It worked on my old Toshiba but not on this new one!!

Who are HiVal?

Best regards,

L



To: JRH who wrote (32721)6/20/1999 2:03:00 AM
From: engineer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
If your realy concerned with use and reliability, then spending $290 rather than $129 is worth it. My kids burn MP3's onto CD's alomst every night. We use the CD rom for digital camera archives, and I do backups (incremental) in 1 disk at night while I sleep. The media costs only $5, rather than the zip cost of $30, so your fist backup makes up the differnce.

there is cheap and then there is hidden costs. The CD is actually cheaper in the long run.