Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: coug who wrote (15782)	6/20/1999 12:17:00 PM
From: coug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

Actually I went back and read Mr. Liller's report and here is a couple of quotes.. "Drilling data is insufficient to calculate a drill indicated resource. Simple volumetric calculations based on the available data infer a potential 25,000,000 tonne target may be present in the Lipangue breccia pipe. No grade estimations can be made at this time." "the Lipangue breccia pipe has a target size on the order of 25,000,000 tonnes. "This is only an effort to quantify the potential size of the prospective target with the limited data available. Grade estimations can not be made nor should it be assumed that the entire breccia zone would be of economic grade.." So as I understand this report, he can ONLY see at this time, A TARGET of 25 mt.. and that is with assuming the ENTIRE zone is economically mineralized.. which he does not know.. because "grade estimations can not be made nor should it be assumed that the entire breccia zone be of ecomic grade."" I don't know, but as they say on this thread.. so much..HMMMM. or is it .... MD..HMMMMMMMMM?? Good luck investors while I do my DD... Coug.. P.S... I am sure glad I went and read Mr Liller's report myself, which seems fine BTW, and DID NOT rely on the SPIN,IMO, of someone else.... Another thing I wonder about from the so called "expert and responsible" posters on this board is WHY they did not discuss this particular post,, before..

To: coug who wrote (15782)	6/20/1999 3:37:00 PM
From: Handshake™	Respond to of 25548

Hang in their coug, you're doing the right thing but you have a lot to catch upon. Maybe you should get the House preliminary reports from a year ago, and see how the pieces of the puzzle have fit, or talk with Mike Gold, he's the resident expert on Geology. By the way IMO from what I know they're not being aggressive, they're being EXTREMELY CAUTIOUS with that inferred... :-)