SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Meathead who wrote (133667)6/21/1999 3:31:00 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
<<What MD means is that a server centric model of computing for
the masses won't win out... i.e. thin clients.

His assertion is that increasing the bandwidth of the internet will
necessitate more power on the desktop... not less.>>

Meathead: Great comments. I agree that as more users experience the benefits of increasing bandwidth, they will want to do MORE with their desktop PC. This is good for the DELLs and the Intels of the world.

Boy, I think some of the Fund Managers are waking up and buying a little more DELL today <G>.!!

Best Regards,

Scott



To: Meathead who wrote (133667)6/21/1999 3:32:00 PM
From: Robert Scott Diver  Respond to of 176387
 
Thanks. That is what I was hoping was being said. Don't have access to the actual article. Scott



To: Meathead who wrote (133667)6/21/1999 4:26:00 PM
From: SecularBull  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Meathead, this is the (t?)billion dollar question... Can a thin client take the advatange over the higher-powered PC in internet connectivity?

Your answer is "no" from what I read. I'd like to be able to believe you are correct, but I have to wonder if both might have a strong market in the future. I understand that the individual's choice of content ("the phone company doesn't tell you who to call") might necessitate the power on the desktop, but for corporate networks and simple internet data processing, perhaps the thin client might be more cost effective?

Your thoughts?

Thanks.

LoD