Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Biotechnology Value Fund, L.P. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: aknahow who wrote (738)	6/22/1999 11:00:00 AM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4974

George, I know it makes 'financial' sense to "glaum" a stock up at lower prices, and then pay a higher price for the balance rather than buying 100% at the takeover price. My point is simply I haven't seen companies (not raiders... they do as Mac pointed out) do this, whether they think it's unethical or what I don't know. Take AZA... the stock was rumored all last week, yet what I'm saying is I dont think AZA was buying... I was simply wondering if anyone had seen a case where they did. Don't care about "having" anyone... just want to keep up with "the way things work". If companies like AZA are out there sneaking shares into the coffer before bids, the game becomes much more difficult IMO. DAK DAK