SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (2477)6/23/1999 10:24:00 PM
From: Mark Bartlett  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4504
 
Claude,

My 5 bucks was based on finding nothing more at TG1, or anywhere else ..... IMO very unlikely. Like you, I think we are headed higher.

I think the chances at TG3 are excellent. IMO it would be very unlikely we could have these 2 anomalies so close, and have them show completely different metal profiles - possible, but not likely.

In the final analysis, I believe MAN will be bought out at some point in the future .... as to when and how much, time will tell.

MB



To: Claude Cormier who wrote (2477)6/24/1999 2:53:00 AM
From: Elizabeth Andrews  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4504
 
Before toast in the morning, consider the similarities between this promotion and the Starfield fiasco. A better class of citizens? But what else? Look at the exploration program. Not new? A redrill of the known? This one smells of metallurgical problems.

If this were economic in 1980 why wasn't it developed? Don't tell me the Shining Path was the reason.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News