Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: john dodson who wrote (23489)	6/23/1999 10:16:00 PM
From: MileHigh	Respond to of 93625

There she blows! MileHigh

To: john dodson who wrote (23489)	6/23/1999 10:29:00 PM
From: john dodson	Respond to of 93625

Was the DELL stuff announced for the first time after hours? If so, then maybe we'll get a bounce tomorrow! -John

To: john dodson who wrote (23489)	6/23/1999 10:50:00 PM
From: Dave B	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

This must have been the 6/23/99 news that SkyTrader was talking about. Way cool!

To: john dodson who wrote (23489)	6/23/1999 11:05:00 PM
From: Apollo	Respond to of 93625

Great post John, Thanx, Stan...<eom>

To: john dodson who wrote (23489)	6/24/1999 12:22:00 AM
From: Boplicity	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

re: Dell is expected to buy fully two thirds of the Rambus memory chip supply available in the last quarter of 1999 and the first quarter of 2000, according to Warburg Dillon Read financial analyst Seth Dickson. The above shows how behind the rest of the PC industry is compared to DELL. Being fist to market is what 6 days inventory and config. to order will do for you. 2/3 ---> amazing Greg

To: john dodson who wrote (23489)	6/24/1999 6:58:00 AM
From: Ian Anderson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Dell must be using the Carmel chipset, since Camino only supports one Rambus Channel. Carmel was originally scheduled to come out later than Camino, but I think they are now synchronized. So I was slightly wrong in my prediction in Message 10204292 Great news anyway. That should give the FUDsters something to chew on. It should particularly dispose of the 'No significant performance gain' argument. with 2 Rambus channels, and 3.2Gb/sec, this will be blinding, and once again put the processor as the limiting component. Ian