Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Patrick Hennessey who wrote (46681)	6/23/1999 11:16:00 PM
From: PaperChase	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 53903

You could get in trouble tonight on this thread for finding something positive in the MU earnings announcement. <G> All I keep hearing about is how "just one of these quarters" MU is really going to shock the street with losses. Well, I am still waiting. They were suppose to "shock" the street this quarter according to resident bear Mr. Skeeter. Another non-shocker is how poorly AMD is doing in competing against Intel. I have built both AMD based and Intel based systems, and the Intel systems (processor, motherboard, chipsets) are by a wide margin, faster, more stable, and easier to implement than the AMD crapola. And of course we'll all hearing about how bad this is for Intel that AMD can't compete with its 4 year old designed Socket 7 processors. Perhaps I'll be able to buy the dip tomorrow in Intel too. Here is my list of real crappy companies that deserve a slow death: Compaq (CPQ) an absolutely garbage company with garbage products Diamond (DIMD) not even worth talking about it is so poorly managed 3COM (COMS) a company without innovation AMD (AMD) see above statement Inacom, etc., etc What the bears mistakenly do is look at these crap companies and then judge the entire industry by them. That's like judging Dell's future by Packard Bell's crappy customer service and declining sales. <G>