SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (84413)6/24/1999 10:51:00 AM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Scumbria,

Below what the San Jose Murky News has to say about AMD this morning. The segment I cut out describes what is often called a death spiral in this (or any) industry. Vendor loses mucho money. Customers lose faith and go elsewhere. Vendor loses more money. I forget, which way does the spiral go in the northern hemisphere, clockwise or counter-clockwise?

''It is a self-fulfilling prophecy,'' he said. Once the company starts losing huge
sums of money, the research squeeze ''only gets worse.''

Wednesday's release from AMD contained another ominous sign for the Athlon,
the centerpiece of AMD's push into the market for more powerful and higher
profit-margin chips.

AMD said its quarterly sales suffered because frustrated potential customers
didn't return to the fold once AMD solved the manufacturing problems that
plagued the K6 last year. The company chose to supply only its ''first-tier'' PC
manufacturer customers when chip yields lagged.

Customer confidence is an even larger concern with the Athlon, because it is the
first AMD chip in years whose design differs significantly from Intel's chips.
Computer manufacturers and component makers will have to design their products
specifically to support AMD's new processors.


mercurycenter.com

Posted at 9:50 p.m. PDT Wednesday, June 23, 1999

AMD to post record loss

It's producing more chips than it can sell

BY DEBORAH CLAYMON
Mercury News Staff Writer

Advanced Micro Devices Inc. -- which has stumbled in
recent quarters because of production problems and
price competition -- said Wednesday it expects to post
its worst operating loss ever because of a new
dilemma.

This time, AMD made too many chips.

W.J. Sanders III, AMD's longtime chairman and chief executive, said in a
statement that AMD expects to manufacture more than 6 million of its flagship K6
microprocessors during the quarter ending June 30. But it is unlikely to sell more
than 3.7 million of them.

For that reason, Sunnyvale-based AMD expects less than $600 million in
operating revenues and more than $200 million in losses in its second quarter.
Yet these results -- which Sanders termed ''a bitter disappointment'' -- are more
than just the latest evidence of AMD's failure to capitalize on the K6, its strongest
potential competitor in years to chip giant Intel Corp.'s product line.

The numbers also leave AMD in a weak position as it introduces its newest chip,
previously called the K7 but now dubbed the Athlon microprocessor. AMD
simply cannot afford to incur such enormous losses at a time it needs to invest
research and development funds to push its technology ahead, said Keith
Diefendorff, editor-in-chief of Microprocessor Report.

''It is a self-fulfilling prophecy,'' he said. Once the company starts losing huge
sums of money, the research squeeze ''only gets worse.''

Wednesday's release from AMD contained another ominous sign for the Athlon,
the centerpiece of AMD's push into the market for more powerful and higher
profit-margin chips.

AMD said its quarterly sales suffered because frustrated potential customers
didn't return to the fold once AMD solved the manufacturing problems that
plagued the K6 last year. The company chose to supply only its ''first-tier'' PC
manufacturer customers when chip yields lagged.

Customer confidence is an even larger concern with the Athlon, because it is the
first AMD chip in years whose design differs significantly from Intel's chips.
Computer manufacturers and component makers will have to design their products
specifically to support AMD's new processors.

The continuing bad news is also likely to put more pressure on company founder
Sanders, recently singled out by national business magazines as one of the nation's
worst performing CEOs.

An AMD spokesman, however, defended the company's performance. ''Clearly
these kinds of losses are not good news,'' said Scott Allen. He called the
company's execution ''pretty good'' but said to successfully compete against Intel,
the company's actions must be flawless.

AMD and Intel have been battling at the low end of the PC market, where the K6
contends with Intel's Celeron for a place in sub-$1,000 PCs. Intel has driven the
average selling price of these microprocessors well below $80, squeezing
AMD's profits and helping to drive a third competitor, National Semiconductor's
Cyrix Corp., out of the market altogether.

AMD believes the Athlon will allow it to escape its low-end woes. Industry
analysts believe this strategy may work, but said it's a risky one for a company
that has had such trouble with execution.

''AMD is living on the edge, there's no question about it,'' said Charles Boucher,
a semiconductor analyst with Credit Suisse First Boston in San Francisco. Still,
Boucher said, the release of the Athlon is a silver lining.

''If AMD executes the Althon well, it could start to build an R&D war chest to
keep the fight going,'' said Boucher. ''But if the company stumbles again, they will
be really challenged to produce any next generation technology.''

To avoid that fate, AMD is experimenting with ways to make chips with less
capital expenditure than Intel. It recently forged a partnership with Motorola to
combine production efforts and reduce overall costs.

Even though quarterly sales fell way short, computer manufacturers have not
abandoned AMD, said George Iwanyc, an analyst with Santa Clara-based
Dataquest. He believes PC makers want AMD to remain a viable competitor to
Intel. ''AMD provides the best negotiating argument to Intel,'' he said.

AMD's ailing stock -- which closed down $1.06 at $18.19 Wednesday -- is likely
to dip further today on the announcement, which came after the close of market.
Analysts had expected AMD's quarterly loss to be about one-third what Sanders
projected.

In its first quarter, AMD had a loss of $118.8 million, or 81 cents a share.

''Athlon is AMD's one hope,'' said Diefendorff. ''If they can't pull it off then it
looks like nobody is going to be able to compete with Intel.''



To: Scumbria who wrote (84413)6/24/1999 4:13:00 PM
From: SisterMaryElephant  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Scumbria, all:

To all those who think Intel Inside means nothing and only "Mghz sells" here is one data point to chew on.

Forrester Technographics Study Finds That Brands Don't Matter to Young Consumers On-Line,

CAMBRIDGE, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 24, 1999--Although young consumers are familiar with the leading brands in the off-line world, new survey results from Forrester Research, Inc. (NASDAQ:FORR) reveals that these brands are of little consequence to their on-line behavior. In the first Forrester Technographics(R) study of on-line young consumers between the ages of 16 and 22, 8,600 respondents were asked what they think of 50 leading brands, whether they visit these brands' Web sites, and how likely they would be to consider purchasing these brands. While the off-line brands received mixed reviews, the respondents showed no interest in the brands on-line.

"We were very surprised to find that some of the hottest brands in the off-line world have no on-line value among young consumers," said Shelley Morrisette, group director, Quantitative Research at Forrester. "Equally surprising was the fact that, with the exception of Intel and Yahoo!, even the high-tech brands on the list failed to capture the interest of these on-line consumers. This suggests is that brand on-line is not terribly important. What matters on-line is utility and activity."

Forrester estimates that there are currently 12.4 million 16- 22 year olds on-line today in the United States -- nearly 47% of the age group. With a mean yearly income of $3,000, young consumers represent a $37 billion market.


SK



To: Scumbria who wrote (84413)6/24/1999 8:37:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 186894
 
SCUMbria - Re: "Since the FTC wisely determined that Intel was not a monopoly, Cyrix has gone under and AMD has lost half of their business. One K7 slip and Intel owns the entire x86 market."

Intel's Incompetent Competitors lose money - and some go out of business.

If that leaves Intel the "Last Man Standing", then DARWINISM is at work.

Paul