Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FCM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Salt'n'Peppa who wrote (947)	6/25/1999 3:26:00 AM
From: Noneyet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2891

Rick I enjoy the way you attempt to make trivia out the fact that franklin confused who was which companies subsidiary. After and despite, the fact you were proven wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You wrote; >>>>>>>>>Man, I can't believe I am trying to debate with a child-mind here.<<<<<<<<<<<<<< You feel the need to throw in your BS comments. I have always refrained from making any derogatory comments towards you, but, not you, my friend. You could not believe that you were debating with a child-mind ( You knew you were above that ). Who's mind is child like now, Rick ???? It safe to assume from the correction, franklin did not agree WITH YOU. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Most companies know this instinctively, and can get that information correct in print or verbally, even if they forget to dot an i, or cross a t, forget a comma. The fact that the company was confused over who was who's subsidiary can definitely be equated with the misplacing of a comma or neglect to dot an i. Why, it would certainly be absurd for anyone to think those two mistakes are not equally important. Bull Spin Doctor reply # 21; If the company was confused about subsidiary's, and gave out conflicting statements, tell them, that mistake is the same as omitting a comma. HUH ?????