Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Kenneth Starr denies his probe was politically motivated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (191)	6/25/1999 11:27:00 AM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 470

>>Juries shouldn't have "choices", they should follow the law Then why have them at all? The judge knows more about the law than any jury.<< The "choice" they have is guilt or innocence based upon the evidence. I'm all in favor of juries, don't misunderstand me. The problem is with "rogue" juries that do not follow the law or ignore evidence and do their best to make a political statement. The reason this happens is because of the jury selection process, attorneys use this farce to manipulate the outcome of trial. OJ Simpson is the most glaring, egregious example of it. It should be totally random with a basic intelligence test requirement. bp