Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dgz who wrote (21953)	6/25/1999 9:37:00 PM
From: Rocket Red	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 26850

Dgz I heard what Stewart Said as Well.

To: dgz who wrote (21953)	6/25/1999 9:41:00 PM
From: Berry Picker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

I'm going to see RT on tuesday nite Perhaps I should enquire into it for you (if you like)

To: dgz who wrote (21953)	6/25/1999 9:55:00 PM
From: LaFayette555	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26850

Hi dgz, consistent for us may mean something like even, homogenious, equal troughout but rock is not baloney, it varies even in the case of a "single phase" emplacement; for the geos. the results of pit 1 & 2 were consistent and are indeed consistent. I belived someone (teevee?) mentionned there is indication the thicker segments of the 'kimberlite' are richer in diamonds and that makes sense. Indeed parts of the deposit can be richer than others but still the deposit will be consistent in that it contains diamonds troughout.