Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jbe who wrote (30107)	6/26/1999 3:44:00 PM
From: jpmac	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71178

<thinking really hard>... I guess I would be termed "spiritual" as I believe, accept, or whatever, a "something". This I don't question. For me it's a connection to the universe, my place in it, my own interpretation and communication. But on a social level, in dealing with people, with our society and the world.. i question a great deal. I'm rather, very unhappy at times with the state of things. I don't believe. I want proof. I believe in the universe but am unsure of my fellow humans, with some exceptions. But I don't think of this as on par with, or the same as (I hope), the material world being messed up and us only needing a spiritual world, like with streets of gold and all. And many I meet that call themselves "agnostics" have far more faith in humankind and this world than I do, and certainly more than many that call themselves "the faithful that will save us all". Dang, I think I'm probably making no sense. One bottom line is that I would trust you and X to take care of this world far more than I would the so-called "religious right" even though I would call myself a person of "faith" and you call yourself an "agnostic".