Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FCM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Noneyet who wrote (1085)	6/27/1999 1:53:00 PM
From: rd greer	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 2891

"Mark, I am damn proud of you. That was your best contribution to this thread to date." We are still waiting for your contribution, Sir. But you are still quite successful in getting other people to answer YOUR questions without you having to answer the challenge Seth laid down. rd

To: Noneyet who wrote (1085)	6/27/1999 4:13:00 PM
From: mark garner	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2891

i think anyone here is willing to answer any real concerns that may be brought up regarding this investment. it just gets to be old to continue harping on things that happened 2 years ago. what happened 2 years ago is inconsequential for one reason: we have a new COO who has proven that he is running this company under different pricipals. he is getting results that cannot be disputed. it also gets to be old to discuss something that has no bearing on the business. the controversy about the subsidiary definition on the website was pretty petty and did not deserve to be discussed through dozens of posts. i was quite surprised that anybody saw any significance to that. i dont want to spend hours a day looking at this board and responding to petty arguements. but i am willing to give the bullish side to any bearish arguement.