Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Centennial Technologies (CTN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hamby Hutcheson who wrote (1937)	6/29/1999 8:03:00 AM
From: manny t	Respond to of 1959

Your recommendation is a bit late in my case. Manny T.

To: Hamby Hutcheson who wrote (1937)	7/1/1999 12:21:00 PM
From: Shaun	Respond to of 1959

Hamby, I agree completely. Already have my no vote ready to go! No way am I going to make this any easier for them. AFter getting a whopping 3.5% of moneys lost back to me in settlement I would just as soon see them go under--or at least have to work to make things right. Besides if this stock reverse splits our only hope is an "AMZN" like growth spurt--and that just to get our money back. BTW--anyone know anything about the additional law suits? Any chance of getting another 3.5% back? Shaun

To: Hamby Hutcheson who wrote (1937)	7/1/1999 4:23:00 PM
From: Dr. Edwards	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1959

Hamby, We all know that both splits and reverse splits do not change the fundamental value of a company (or its stock). If the reverse split speeds the time to being listed on a broad exchange and, thus, improves liquidity, is this not at least preferred to less liquidity. Splits and reverse splits are basically ways of increasing liquidity. I would appreciate more information that builds the case for voting against the reverse split as proposed. Thanks.