SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: truedog who wrote (13127)6/29/1999 5:57:00 PM
From: goldsnow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17770
 
BTW, #1 for alcoholism are the Irish.>>

Only because they publish statistics...Plus it depends on definition of alcoholic <gg>

1. Russians
2. Poles



To: truedog who wrote (13127)6/29/1999 6:24:00 PM
From: Andy Thomas  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 17770
 
Hi TD,
Thanks for the response to Neocon. Perhaps you and DD have some valid points - of course you do.

On the other hand, everyone is a sinner, and you and I know the antidote for that. Maybe even in light of all of the evil which the settlers propagated, there had to be that collateral damage because the messangers were often impure; but the gospel had to be spread to the ends of the earth.

There were - even if the majority of Europeans were of evil intent and/or deed- some very saintly missionaries in their midst, and these men did plant some "good seeds."

Is that fair?

FWIW
Andy



To: truedog who wrote (13127)6/29/1999 11:55:00 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17770
 
Yes, I was expecting you, and I think that the picture that you paint is fair enough for those NAs who ended up on reservations for long periods. I have met many in the East who are fully assimilated, however. What the relative proportions are, I cannot say, but I have met quite a few. Also, I do not see how the condition of the continent can be considered poor when both agriculture and industry are thriving, and yet there remain plenty of forested areas and parklands, and pollution is being addressed. I agree that the concept of land ownership was foreign to many tribes. My only point is that the carrying capacity of the Americas was by no means filled, and there were many people hungry for land in other countries, and it is not clear why the continents should have been locked up against them. In any event, I am not proud of the ways in which treaties were violated, or of incidents like the Trail of Tears, but I am not sorry overall that Europeans settled the Americas, or that the United States of America was created. Are you?