Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Cybersurf (CY.A) - Bridge between 20th & 21st Centuries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TonyL who wrote (1997)	6/30/1999 5:53:00 PM
From: Sawdusty	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3243

""OT.. Just an example of what can happen to a thread when responding to paid posters, who through their own declaration, hold no position in the stock."" A few sincere questions, if I may. Is it better to have paid posters, pumping a stock to higher levels, fully expecting to short it, knowing full well when the promotion phase will be over? How does one know when other posters are really shareholders? Because they say so? What real difference does it make? BTW, I have seen far more attacks by so called believers. Anyone with half a brain understands how the hypesters have dominated many of the threads.

To: TonyL who wrote (1997)	6/30/1999 6:17:00 PM
From: CocoBob	Respond to of 3243

The CY thrashers on this thread don't own (have no money) and don't even short (They never had the guts to declare it ever) nor do they have any substance in content. I don't mind accepting and reading about negative fundamentals if true - but these people are pure wholesome losers who put false negative spins on an up day and even call the stock a scam (legal liable on slander). "I hope the new Beta site has an IGNORE button so that soon these internet junkies can only post to themselves and go back to their CB radio sets." If you support this idea - send to SI Bob - Re: Beta site to have an IGNORE Button