Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (1693)	7/1/1999 12:12:00 AM
From: golden_tee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Don't you think that you should have done basic dd before initiating a short position on it? I guess basic research is really beneath a short genius such as yourself. Ooooh, I have again criticized Wexler for his apparent lack of research before spouting off about an imagined stock fraud. Looks like this should be good for at least 1/2 a dozen attacks from his sworn lemmings. P.S. How is your short of the VLNC stock fraud doing? You don't seem to mention it lately? Could the 3 P.O.'s and the endorsement of the US government have anything to do with that? Could it's inclusion in the Russell 2000 have anything to do with that? Just curious. Don't disappoint me lemmings. P.S. Good pick Michael, made some $ on that one!

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (1693)	7/1/1999 12:18:00 AM
From: golden_tee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Always SCREAM fraud first and do the dd second. Good plan Bill!

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (1693)	7/1/1999 1:15:00 AM
From: S. maltophilia	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

****OT******<g> Hello, Bill Any thoughts on AVP? Looks rather bloated to me. Flat revenues, somewhat erratic earnings, P/B ~120, etc. I can't see any great improvement in their fundamentals any time soon. Last year, as you recall, it did a nice dive. Maybe again this fall?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (1693)	7/1/1999 2:59:00 PM
From: Bill Wexler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

The CCSI stock fraud... CCSI is now down roughly 40% since my initial short recommendation. For those of you playing our home game, that would be an 80% short-term gain assuming that your short position required 50% margin. Even though CCSI is worth far less - and will eventually go lower, it never hurts to take a little money off the table. Darby Macfarlane and her band of crooks have never been shy in the past about using misleading PR to artificially repump the stock price.