Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bernie Goldberg who wrote (7874)	7/2/1999 1:45:00 AM
From: RFH	Respond to of 18928

Or perhaps Antigua? RFH

To: Bernie Goldberg who wrote (7874)	7/3/1999 1:31:00 PM
From: Dataminer1	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 18928

Hi Everyone, Got some very interesting e-mails from the BLSH gang, (buy-low-sell-high). The gist was the idea of using inversely correlated funds in AIM. The discussion centered around buying USPIX when UOPIX was issuing a sell. Got me thinking that if you could find 2 equities that move exactly opposite of each other, only one cash reserve would be needed, and even then it could be small since the selling in 1 would be funding the cash for the other. Any thoughts? D1 stocksystem.net