To: jbe who wrote (43106 ) 7/2/1999 4:31:00 PM From: Father Terrence Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
One does not have to bang a drum and sacrifice animals on a bloody altar to a god or gods to save the crops, make a daughter fertile, abate the storms, drive away the plague, turn back the locusts, or quiet the thunder to be defined as a mystic. Look at some of the elements of your own quote. I have made key passages bold:Kant, as is well known, reduces religion to a system of conduct. He defines religion as "the acknowledgement that our duties are God's commandments". He describes the essence of religion as consisting in morality. Christianity is a religion and is true only in so far as it conforms to this definition. The ideal Church should be an "ethical republic"; it should discard all dogmatic definitions, accept "rational faith" as its guide in all intellectual matters, and establish the kingdom of God on earth by bringing about the reign of duty . The concept of god is outside our reality. It is supernatural, spiritual, within "another realm" or "plane of existence". Only a mystic would proclaim that our "duties" lie in serving the edicts laid out by a god in some never-never land that cannot be proven to exist. Only a mystic would be so brazen as to coin an expression such as "rational faith" which is actually an oxymoron. A "kingdom of god on earth" would be defined by mystics, controlled by mystics and the duties would serve the interests of the mystics. This is just another form of taking control of individuals and taking value while returning nothing of value. The thug points a gun. The mystic invokes a "higher power", shakes his finger at the heavens and demands fealty to a god or god... and unquestioning duty to the mystic! FT