Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (12710)	7/3/1999 12:28:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Larry, I have to plead ignorance on this issue. Yes the SEC document do state they are not there, the next set of SEC documents might be stating they are. After all, how many rounds is Mr. Murphy going to win? Zeev

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (12710)	7/4/1999 11:41:00 AM
From: MGV	Respond to of 27311

Message 5057204 (Message to take 10K as a reliable source 6/30/98) Message 5064808 Message 5075615 (klemencic forecasting a contract in late August - early September 1998 based on June 1998 CC) Message 5094166 Message 5094344 !!!!!!!!!!! Klemencic explaining his experience in coming up with a forecast of 80-90% probability of mass production by Spetember 1998 I admit I base that probability on my personal experience and on Lev's comments. I spent much of my career starting up plants, and am no stranger to plant start-ups. I am quite familiar with the process used, and generally when all the units in the process have been tested satisfactorily, then timing the rest of the start-up is more predictable. As long as one unit can't operate satisfactorily, timing is not only a shot from the hip, its a shot in the dark. Message 5174693 The above may explain why klemencic is not at the top of corporate america's short list for hiring.