To: Mighty_Mezz who wrote (2787 ) 7/4/1999 11:23:00 PM From: bob sims Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 7056
With all respect, you better await the ruling in the AZNT federal case against Andy Mann (defaulted), First Concorde (defaulted), DTC, Canadian Depository, Whitecliffe, JB Oxford, Shoreline & Canacorde. You will see that the corruption extends from the message boards all the way to the DTC. A company under assault from professional shorts endures much maliciousness, threats & punishment the public is not even aware of. The WSJ article was neutral imo, but nevertheless, Mr. Sylver & myself, both plaintiffs against Shell & co., were not a liberty to expound on the lengths these individuals have gone to. I hope the federal case ruling will show the investment public how far the corruption extends, but the defamation & libel suit will show all , imo, certain individuals roles in the smear campaigns, shorting, manipulation , interference with the ability to do business and the use of S.I. as a tool to accomplish these goals. Being a long AZNT shareholder who gave testimony in the federal case, entered evidence, saw the bullet holes, spoken to the authorities, been to AZNT facilities , use their products, and speak with the AZNT legal team, I await the ruling in the federal case with much enthusiasm. It will set a precendence for other companies who have been wronged by these individuals and their actions. The defamation & libel suit will put together all the pieces and refer to the federal case how far the corruption extends. I wish the best for the HITT case as well, and applaud them for acting quickly on behalf of HITT shareholders, but I suggest you not be so flippant about the AZNT defamation case, its greater in scope than the HITT complaint and was/is preceded by the Federal case against Andy MAnn, et al. clothes changed, out to the fireworks! Have a great 4th! Pugs ********************************************************************** From another thread