Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Temp. Home of Cooperative Group-Trading -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mama Bear who wrote (441)	7/6/1999 5:25:00 PM
From: Sergio H	Respond to of 790

<Admit it, you just don't like his style of posting. > GUILTY <Would you care to make a wager?> NO, NOT INTERESTED.

To: Mama Bear who wrote (441)	7/6/1999 7:20:00 PM
From: mark calder	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 790

Mama Bear, the first amendment has always had limitations. (fire in a crowded theater...) I warned a few of you on the Goldfinger net this could happen. There is too much money at stake with these companies. The effect is chilling because whether or not Mr. Auric is right or wrong it's going to be real expensive to assert his first amendment rights. The thing to do is just short your stock and shut up about it. But on these boards everywhere the short sellers are not content with a short sale, they attempt to Hype their choice and enforce it with rumors, lies, and innuendoes. If Mr. Auric reposted a touched up press release he went over the line and should pay for it. Breaks my heart really!