Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (2884)	7/6/1999 4:05:00 PM
From: Andrew Cook	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4504

CC, Ooops ... I guess I've now identified myself, huh!?!?!? <g> Sorry for not understanding mechanisms on the Canadian exchanges. Hope the general theme was close though. By the way, Claude, what was your impression of the depth where the Sulphide intercepts began? Seemed like a tough comparison against the relatively shallow TG-1. Sorry, again I'm not strong on the in's and out's of the geology. But is it possible that TG-3 parallels TG-1 with respect the the oxide cap (and corresponding gold)? And would the depth of the TG-3 Sulphide imply anything with respect to the thickness of any potential TG-3 oxide cap? Hope these questions aren't totally silly? Regards, Andrew