SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Temp. Home of Cooperative Group-Trading -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David Wise who wrote (456)7/7/1999 10:32:00 AM
From: Mama Bear  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 790
 
David, you can't make a post without twisting the facts and posting lies. You have never caught me being dishonest, whereas it's a proven fact you are an habitual liar. You must be a fan of the motto that if you lie continuously and repeatedly it will be accepted as fact.

A list of some of your lies:

I never said Osicom was a scam. You repeated this lie many times.

You said I claimed Osicom would never sell a Gigamux when my actual statement was that the proceeds would never fall to the bottom line to benefit shareholders. Another lie which you repeated often.

I never said that libel is protected speech.

I never said you 'defamed' the Constitution.

I have never posted knowingly anything dishonest. Every time you say otherwise it's a lie. You said that 'lies and fabrications' are not protected. You are incorrect. Just because you don't understand the First Amendment, doesn't make me a liar. Your lies do make you a liar.

You keep saying that I said that lies are protected speech. I said that simply being a lie doesn't make something unprotected.

There have been several others. You are the poster child for hypocrisy in action.

Barb



To: David Wise who wrote (456)7/7/1999 10:53:00 AM
From: summerboy  Respond to of 790
 
David, you would do well to listen and learn from Mama Bear. Frankly, i don't even know why she should dignify your comments w/ a response.



To: David Wise who wrote (456)7/7/1999 11:11:00 AM
From: wciguy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 790
 
It is not "Wise" to attack Mama Bear's credibility. You will find yourself at an overwhelming disadvantage. Barb is known on SI and many other sites as being completely honest and your attacks can only damage your own reputation, not her's.



To: David Wise who wrote (456)7/7/1999 11:38:00 AM
From: AD  Respond to of 790
 
David, your erroneous statements about MamaBear did a great job of drawing ill-deserved attention your way. Just as a high school shooter does.

You have better pusuits I'm sure.



To: David Wise who wrote (456)7/7/1999 12:40:00 PM
From: peter michaelson  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 790
 
Mr. Wise:

While Barb is more than able to defend her own reputation, I can't let your statement go unanswered.

Barb's reputation is well-known, you are correct. It's a reputation for straight-forward honesty, IMHO.

peter