Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Matt. McCray who wrote (46064)	7/8/1999 11:30:00 AM
From: ChatterjeeP	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 50264

Has anyone talked to anyone related to Digitcom: Cheryl, Roger,Jimmy,SEC attorney? Also, repeating Matt's question, has a company made it after trading halt? May be, this trading halt will jolt these overly-conservative SEC attorneys at DGIV to release some news. Yes, without news, there will be speculation and manipulation. Whatever the constraints are on DGIV releasing news, sure did no good; so, release the news, show what Digitcom is upto. Now, if it was all a dog-and-pony show, that's a different matter. Egypt, Taiwan..all our partners should know that they have to release news to have a viable partner in Digitcom. I am venting here. I still believe in the company but they have to open up and come clean. Holding up news, on one pretext or other, has not served any purpose. Cheers, Partha

To: Matt. McCray who wrote (46064)	7/8/1999 11:49:00 AM
From: Lazarus Long	Respond to of 50264

{{{{{DGIVAHOLICS}}}}} Not a very nice surprise to get the morning going with... Damn! I guess I have a couple of questions that basically are on the same track as that asked by Matt and others. What is the worst that the SEC can do to Digitcom? Halt trading forever? Put the company out of business? Level a hefty fine? - and - 1) What will the impact be on the ability of the company to do business? - and - 2) What will be the long term effect be on the stockholders. I continue to believe that this company is no scam. As a group of investors, we have talked to too many people overseas that actually have had business dealings with Digitcom. If it was a scam, it would have to be run on the same proportion as the scam in the movie, The Sting. ... And as E'Lane so eloquently put it (just a moment ago), "Roger and Jimmy ain't no Paul Newman or Robert Redford." <g> So, I start my thinking through this mess with the conviction that it is not a scam. Given that assumption, what is the worst the SEC can do? I have no idea. Perhaps, those with a little knowledge on the subject might be able to enlighten us all. Lazarus, trying to find my crystal ball