SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Digger who wrote (22668)7/8/1999 6:12:00 PM
From: Chas.  Respond to of 26850
 
Digger I would like to respond to your post with my two cents worth for the hell of it..........based on nothing more than being around this sector since 1994 with Aber and others. Your statement "My bet is on the Geology" well you're right on there, the geology is speaking for itself and the astute speculator follows it closely. Your reference of "low price, low volume"...not true at all. At $4.50c for this particular spec stock the market has it properly valued IMO. The volume for the last couple of days has been moderate to the average with a few big high volume spikes, this speaks well for the stock IMO. Your ref to "monkey wrench in this thing" the monkey wrench is twofold 1. Market apathy & 2. MM manipulation. In reference to 20ct + stones...well maybe one by statistical chance. In reality the next 3000t sample should be very close to the first sample due to dykes being homogenous in nature( assuming this dyke is just like the SA models) this should get a few responses, eh! well like I said, just my 2 cents worth, 1 if you're Canadian.



To: Digger who wrote (22668)7/8/1999 6:19:00 PM
From: Berry Picker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
RE >>My bet is on the geology<<
You will eventually win but when ??

RE>>things could pop as early as next week and
yet low price and low volume.<<

I think maybe as much as 3 weeks... But this stock will trade up at a slow rate until then.

RE>>There is a man made lid on this thing<<

I don't think so I think the people who are buying now are smart enough to buy it slowly.. they know they have 3 weeks why panic and pay more ??? Small and jittery players will hop out at this point - guys like you will hold and win.



To: Digger who wrote (22668)7/8/1999 7:24:00 PM
From: Mike Hermann  Respond to of 26850
 
Digger,
I agree, the geology almost seems too good to be true! maybe that's why some are so skeptical! I think the Geological model points to bigger and better intercepts to come.
Regards,
Mike



To: Digger who wrote (22668)7/9/1999 12:30:00 AM
From: russet  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 26850
 
At the moment, we only know what management wants us to know about the geology. Diamonds are there, no doubt about it, but the best sample is the last one and it says $98US per carat and 1.845 carats per tonne (but don't forget that .6 carats per tonne is probably valueless - Indian goods as teevee would say). It only showed up because the processing was better, so says RT. That leaves $98US times 1.245 = $US122/tonne. Anything more is fantasy, Alice in Wonderland.

All the so-called experts on this thread, before the results were published, said that the dyke/sheet was homogeneous,...now it's not. Now the dyke is richer in the middle than at the extremes,..and now it's richer at depth than at the edges. Chit, chit, chit. If you believe this I want to sell you my car, it really has only 5,000 km on it, 4 times around, must be worth $10,000, eh?

The geology we want to know is the chemical and physical composition of the material surrounding the diamonds in all the holes and bulks. This is strangely absent, it could tell us a lot about the consistency of the dyke...but few companies share this information,...but until they do, you should always expect Bre-X, just my dumb stupid opinion,...but few have suckered russett,...lately.

Also, I don't know about the rest of you but I like the hole by hole results presented, not this average of 30 hole crap. Anyone else notice that many of the squares with wide intersections have few holes drilled in them. So far as I can tell this dyke pinches and swells all over the place. Wonder what the strip ratios will be?

While we are buying, the folks in the know (the so-called insiders) are selling. Of course that only makes sense. Nothing is 100% so make money while you can. Don't forget, they have options to purchase stock at prices like $1.50, 1.80, 2.40 etc., when they find out what the next bulks give,...or what the pre-feasibility study gives in 3 or 4 months they can buy real cheap, while we get diluted. Yes, it will take that long to analyse and crunch the numbers to present the pre-feasibility study which the banks and mutual funds and brokers will use to decide whether to commit dollars to this project. In the meantime we will be left to float on our own devices. .Trev is right,...either you believe or not,...but take a chance, chit your pants, you got a long wait for Santa Claus.

Now what about JK, Herr Kaiser. Was he right??? Did WSP get lucky with the mini-bulks? Guess bulk #4 will decide this, but my guess is it will confirm bulk #3 numbers. So I say we got US$120 per tonne, which is what Jwaneng has in Botswana, not what Aber has at Diavik (US$210/tonne),... except we have about 68% of the action (maybe more) instead of 40%, but we have a sheet over a large area, instead of pipes over a concentrated area. What do you think our costs will be versus Diavik costs? Double maybe?

But on the other hand we have control. Think we can sample 40 million tonnes without getting the mining permit and satisfying the environmental B.S. and the political hacks that want a bribe? Maybe. After all,... all we will do is take the rock out, remove the diamonds and stick the rock back with some cement. But the interest groups will bitch about that because they will not have anything to bitch about, or get bribes from (or at least free coffee and donuts,..eh???). I bet they find some worm, only found under Snap Lake that will be destroyed by mining. What do you do then?

Should be a PP pretty soon, don't you think? After all we need some more money to drill more holes, prove up more resource and bulk sample a few feet from the present bulk samples,...no? After all, where else can a bulk be taken from. The dyke is too deep, or too thin anywhere else,...isn't it?

russett is still a shareholder, but the shares are freebies. He is merely filling the request of several posters that feel all the bears have left the thread, and there is no one left to play devils advocate. I must admit I have been poisoned by the treacle on this thread in the last few weeks,...and blame all of you for this outburst.

russett, the squished hamster. Turn up the volume!!

http://www.hamsterdance.com/