SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (44688)7/9/1999 12:14:00 PM
From: jbe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Is it "knowledge" we are talking about, or raw "data"?

I think it is the latter.

That would explain why researchers "are afraid to delve into these areas -- especially racial differences."

For one thing, most researchers, if they are worth their salt, know that the "differences" they come up with are only rough statistical generalizations about "groups," and that they do not necessarily hold true where specific individuals within those groups are concerned.

They also know that people who already have racial prejudices may seize upon the data as "proof" of one race's inherent superiority or inferiority, and will try to build public policy upon it. And that is why this is a touchy area.




To: epicure who wrote (44688)7/10/1999 9:14:00 PM
From: Grainne  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
<<Kwoledge can always be abused- that is all I make of that. I still think we should do
research on all these areas- racial differences, sex differences- at the moment
researchers are afraid to delve into these areas- especially racial differences.>>

X, what racial differences do we really know of, as scientific fact?