Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (13108)	7/10/1999 1:49:00 PM
From: Lisa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

Neocon, it is true that one can be convicted upon a preponderence of evidence but that rarely happens, and when it does it is usually overturned by a higher court, particularly in criminal cases. JFK's relationship with his children changed the legal status of the Oval Office. Remember possession is 99tenths of the Law, and often the Judicial system is changed forever by one simple act. In Clintons case which I have not really dissected. It would be extremely difficult to separate the Oval office in a Court of Law today, since Jurisprudence is nonexistant. We are in a quagmire with Starrs Investigation. The Right to Privacy in a mans home is absolute unless there is substantial evidence that a felony has been committed, and even then it is held in high regard. This law is often violated in drug cases, where the wrong door came down and is a good Attorneys dream. Best we pray that our Constitution remains intact and the Declaration of Independence remains in force. Lisa