SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve Porter who wrote (64688)7/10/1999 3:00:00 PM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579701
 
Steve,

Intel and 3COM compete directly in some markets. Have you tracked Intel's progress in this regard?

BTW, IMHO, when you invest with Intel, today, you are investing in a much bigger picture than just x86. I say this granting that many of Intel's efforts are nascent at this point.

PB



To: Steve Porter who wrote (64688)7/10/1999 11:39:00 PM
From: Windsock  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1579701
 
Re <Well I think Intel makes money on *some* of the celerons. I think they actually lose money on the low-end celerons.>

You think wrong and have nothing to support your thoughts. Indeed, there are many bits of information that support the position that Intel makes profits on all Celeron processors.

Do you really believe that Intel should compete only a little bit so that AMD can become a Welfare Queen?



To: Steve Porter who wrote (64688)7/11/1999 1:08:00 AM
From: Amy J  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579701
 
RE: "but it's even better for 3com and the like ;)"

How is it better for 3Com?

Amy J