Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WAVX Anyone? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pat Pending who wrote (8118)	7/11/1999 4:50:00 AM
From: nikita	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11417

To all: Does anyone on this thread talk about WAVX. Do you know what I find interesting? The fact you actually spend time (IMO - Wasted) reading and more time (wasted) writing to people who offend you and also who you don't agree with. No revenues, (2K) negative earnings, lots of 144 and insiders selling ,R&D company now with Products which look very promising with what can be considered huge potential, Atmel partnership. Currently I have no open positions on WAVX - owned it a 5 3/4 sold at 22 (not the farm as far as shares) - bought because the products IMO show promise, 22 came to quickly. The point is people need to make up there own minds as to what to believe and what to read and what to write and what to buy. Do your DD, make your investments and don't rely on others opinions or comments or editorials. Before the threads what did you do? Called the company, received a shareholder package, reviewed the package, researched the company, checked the chart and made a decision. Long term I believe this company shows promise.

To: Pat Pending who wrote (8118)	7/11/1999 10:31:00 AM
From: 24601	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11417

To Pat Pending: You have a rude history on this board. And a history of bad calls, as well. (1) Your last post before this one suggested that Wave should be shorted -- in October 1998. (2) You once spent some number of weeks insisting that RCOM and WAVX were in something of a zero-sum competition. Is RCOM still putting Wave out of business? (3) You say that Marty takes himself seriously?