SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WAVX Anyone? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Arthur Radley who wrote (8130)7/11/1999 10:55:00 PM
From: Harold Lehman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11417
 
I think that Wave offers encryption/decryption that offers content providers a lot more security from piracy than Liquid Audio.



To: Arthur Radley who wrote (8130)7/12/1999 12:58:00 PM
From: Norman Klein  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 11417
 
TexasDude, this is my understanding about Liquid Audio and WAVX

Think of WAVX's Embassy chip as being a lower level product underneath the Liquid Audio's of the world. The LA's will quickly discover that their software protection schemes are inherently insecure. I believe that all of the digital distributors will eventually end up having to strike a deal with WAVX. The WAVX Embassy chip will serve as the underlying vehicle to allow the secure distribution of their digital goods.

The marketplace will determine the percentage that WAVX will be able to charge for its secure digital distribution services to the Liquid Audio's vendors. This still hasn't really been settled.

Remember the question isn't software vs. hardware. It is whether the the WAVX Embassy chip solution is secure enough. Everything else has already failed miserably.