SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 3Com Corporation (COMS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rest42 who wrote (32353)7/12/1999 10:02:00 AM
From: Andre Williamson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 45548
 
Convenient how one can twist numbers to suit one's purpose.

The chart I looked at went from $1.60 to $27 (with some pit stops at $80, $60ish, and $50ish. If you're such an "old timer," then why do you read the chart only from $80 down, and why is your time horizon only 2-1/2 years?

As for CSCO, terrific company, but for all the wonders I think it it's still ahead of itself. Just so happens that CSCO is a model company that leads the networkers. COMS by comparison looks crappy.

But I'm with those who think that COMS has little downside and a lot of upside, whereas CSCO has a fair amount of downside. Don't forget that although CSCO earnings may be up about 100% in the last two years, their stock is up over 500%. If the world economy hiccups in any major way CSCO could easily lose $100 billion of market cap.

Let's put it another way. If CSCO's market cap doubles again soon then it will probably be in the top 3 companies globally. I just don't think it can sustain its recent valuation growth. COMS, OTOH, has less than $10 billion market cap (with a fair chunk of that cold hard cash) and lots of room to run.

Andre



To: rest42 who wrote (32353)7/12/1999 1:07:00 PM
From: Greg Jung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 45548
 
rest42: Please explain the term "Git", including all of the implications you have attached to it. I am not well practised in the general art of slander or racism, so I'd appreciate this clarification. Thank you.

Greg