SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ali Chen who wrote (65016)7/12/1999 10:20:00 PM
From: Fred Fahmy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579927
 
Since you refuse to drop it....I will try and help you one last time.

The response below the line is from a tenure math professor at Northern Illinois University.

BTW re: your example of a salary two times smaller...a salary two times smaller would be the same salary with a negative sign in front of it.

I have to believe this is a language difference problem. Try to think literally. Two times smaller means you reduce the original number by two times the original number. Four times smaller means you reduce the original number by four times the original number. This is English.

FF

====================================================================

Fred Fahmy wrote:
>
> Greg,
>
> Which statement is mathematically correct:
>
> 1) .25 is 4 times smaller than 1
>
> 2) .25 is .75 times smaller than 1
>
> Thanks,
>
> Fred
>
>

Hey, Fred.

Well of course statement 2 is correct and statement 1 is not.

Although 1 is false, it is true that 1 is 4 times the size of .25

In general, to say that x is k times smaller than y would be the
same as saying that (y-x)/y = k (or equivalently, 1 - (x/y) = k).

While "x is k times larger than y" means (x-y)/y = k.

Also "x is k times the size of y" means x/y = k.

It may make more sense to think of something being on sale at a store.
If an item lists for $100, a 75% price reduction would give a sale price
of $25 (the sale price is .75 times smaller than the list price).
But if you wanted to raise the price from $25 to $100, that would amount
to a 300% increase. So a 75% reduction is "undone" with a 300% increase.

Hope this helps.

-Greg



To: Ali Chen who wrote (65016)7/12/1999 10:57:00 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579927
 
Re: "As you have seen, even some Product Engineers
cannot sometimes compare what is bigger and what
is smaller, and how many times smaller. "

Give it up Ali, you're becoming an embarrassment.

EP



To: Ali Chen who wrote (65016)7/12/1999 11:14:00 PM
From: survivin  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 1579927
 
Gwennap still has doubts whether the Athlon is a true 7th generation processor.

mdronline.com@20723663sctldj/mpr/editorials/edit13_09.html