Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: William Brotherson who wrote (46337)	7/13/1999 11:44:00 AM
From: Jack Colton	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50264

Good Morning Everyone also! Hey, I think I found Mr. & Mrs. Moosie's hide out. They do have a web site dedicated to stocks: greenbackers.com

To: William Brotherson who wrote (46337)	7/13/1999 12:43:00 PM
From: MR. FISH	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 50264

Good morning Everyone is a great way to start in my book Bill. I have a question for you and the rest of the group. How, who and what could have caused the SEC to jump now? Obviosly the run up in volume was a good excuse but I have seen run ups in volume with a bazillion other companies that actually did release news after the run up. Nothing happens to them. Then why? It is an old tell all. I have always followed volume. Volume is an indicator of interest period. The more volume the more interest. But I am curious as to why the SEC picked Digitcom a small company on the otc bb. For volume increase? Hmmm? There has been so much bashing of this stock and so many people that lost their butts here last year. Does anyone here think that there is an individual or individuals who are vindictive enough to poke at the SEC enough to get their attention at a time when it looks like we have a very strong chance at taking off? Does anyone here think that some of the bashers held short and saw the good potentially coming and were able to get the SEC's attention? I just have a hard time with the fact that the SEC has suspended trading do to a modest run up in volume. I have a hard time believing it is due to something that happened 1 1/2 years ago. Not now. Why now? There is no mystery to what is going on with the company as far as we know. Mr. Chin has pointed out the fact that we have completed contracts in a TV interview. Of course we would have a run up in volume. He has advertised specifically to do this. And of course there is interest out there that want in, look at CLRN and at the levels they bought in at. BTW, it is still holding at high levels. 38 plus. The SEC, from my understanding did check us out prior to the halt and was told that they must have liked what they saw. Either this is not the case and they did not like what they saw or there is something else that is unclear to me. I know we are going to here about it good or bad but I got to tell you I emphatically believe we are for real. I am really stuggling with this halt and why. I don't see where the SEC thought they should have done this. Companies struggle in the beginning, make mistakes and are unclear at times where they sit in deals. We are a little company in a big, hot arena. Information is delicate and must be handled accordingly. Has Digitcom done something so terrible to justify this action or has someone created a nuisance or a pain in the SEC butt to where they just responded? Help me OB1 Canobi! Mr. Fish