SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DanZ who wrote (2059)7/13/1999 3:09:00 PM
From: Bill Wexler  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 10293
 
<<<I have asked you on several occasions to be up-front with your position in GUMM.>>>

This is a lie. You have never asked me anything about my short position. You're making a lame attempt to cast a negative light on me by implying that I have something to hide. I do not. I issued a strong sell/short sell recommendation on GUMM. I shorted at an average price of 12 13/16. GUMM price has been artificially inflated because of the fraudulent promotion of its quack cold remedy.



To: DanZ who wrote (2059)7/13/1999 3:10:00 PM
From: Dale Baker  Respond to of 10293
 
Bill doesn't normally post his trades, just recommendations. That's the style he has developed over the past few years.

Not every thread is a "post every trade" thread. I have one that is, but Bill usually doesn't.

FWIW, I have no position in GUMM.

Oops, Bill posted this trade. Never mind.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News