Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: paulmcg0 who wrote (46422)	7/14/1999 5:48:00 PM
From: Howard C.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

That is a very interesting theory. And what might be the resolution in such a situation? What happens, say, if DGIV could not come up with corroborating documentation to back up those 1-2 year old claims to the satisfaction of the SEC?

To: paulmcg0 who wrote (46422)	7/14/1999 5:51:00 PM
From: Dolfan	Respond to of 50264

Paul and we pay taxes for these Bozos to protect us the shareholder. I admit some of those older PR's were skeptical, but we long's took it with a grain of salt and held anyway. Just when DGIV is starting to maybe show us some earnings you know who steps in a little bit late and ruins the show! I think they better hire some more people they can do better then this. This is of course if the reason we got halted. Mark

To: paulmcg0 who wrote (46422)	7/14/1999 6:07:00 PM
From: Howard C.	Respond to of 50264

GREAT MOMENTS IN HISTORY: THE PROPHECY Tuesday, Jul 14 1998 10:26AM ET Reply # of 46427 To: Mike Ankley who wrote (18162) From:dgivinvestor A NOTE TO ALL: It is my strong recommendation that we be very very cautious in terms of discussing any further things like our nasdaq filing, earnings, contracts, publicly on the Net UNTIL we have a common plan of action. This type of unfettered, loose talking, discussion in front of certain people is not helping us in any way. It provides a wealth of fodder for them to feed on. Let's start using our heads and realize that what we say, good, bad, right, wrong, factual or fiction, is easily picked up by anyone lurking on the Net and can and is used against us.

To: paulmcg0 who wrote (46422)	7/14/1999 6:08:00 PM
From: E'Lane	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

Thanks, Paul... I do appreciate the way you have treated this halt. Your information has been helpful and interesting, and not in the least condescending or "painful". For that, I can't "not" say thanks, I, for one appreciate it. Confusion does make for odd alliances I suppose. Having gotten that out of my system... Your advising us that there have been NO shareholder lawsuits does ease a few minds I'm sure. Do shareholder "complaints" fall under that category? As to "this could be related to the PRs from last year"...is there no statue of limitations where a company is concerned? No "water under the bridge"? No "they've survived that"? Nothing? Is it a matter of not wanting to feel like they have wasted their time so "might as well go on with the halt"? A "once you were guilty, so you are guilty again" attitude? I guess it just feels like a double whammy. We "suffered" for the PRs when they came out, we licked our wounds and chose to stick around in spite of them possibly being "misleading" (yeah, sarcasm) and now we are "suffering" for them again? Anyway...appreciate the information. E'Lane