Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: out_of_the_loop who wrote (2189)	7/16/1999 9:38:00 AM
From: JDN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Dear Dr. Epstein: Well, you are a medical doctor so I presume you have a better awareness then most of us, especially me, as to the claims made regarding the product. Thus, I consider your medical comments strongly. I should point out though that a company can do VERY WELL and still the shareholders get the shaft. Examples such as dilutive financing plans, generous options, greedy management that sells out for personal gain etc etc. These areas I still am not sure about with GUMM. Would you care to share your comments? JDN

To: out_of_the_loop who wrote (2189)	7/16/1999 11:21:00 AM
From: Marconi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Hello Dr. Epstein: JDN's comments Please review your dictionary. JDN's comments were irony, not sarcasm. It IS funny how the remarks you made to which he responded were cutoff remarks, yet offered nothing of substance. It is ironic that your defensive remarks prove nothing, nor disprove what you were reacting to in commentary. JDN's irony did not stretch to an effort to hurt your feelings--he was not sarcastic in his irony. Regards, m