SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (35404)7/16/1999 10:41:00 PM
From: 2brasil  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Maurice thanks for all that feedback reading it all now did they say anything about Brazil handset production when will they start producing handsets in that country?
regards
bruce



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (35404)7/17/1999 1:45:00 AM
From: quidditch  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
China, Taiwan and CDMA, with a slightly OT Twist.
Those on the thread will recall, approximately a fortnight or two ago, that in connection with upcoming OHG and ITU standards discussions, China weighed in with its own CDMA entry, an indigenously developed flavor of CDMA, it was said (I can't remember which initial Mme.__ prefixed [pris fixe]). But the query was (JohnG, you and I were involved) how this would play out in terms of royalty rate/licensing restrictions and liberties and negotiations between the Q and Ministry of Communications.

In today's NYT reportage of China's sabre-rattling against Taiwan, China slipped into a report of developments its reference to its home style and self-developed neutron and small nuclear bomb capacity. Absolutely consistent with China's view of itself as a resourceful, great power (Cox report supporters notwithstanding). China is in fact a great power and has many ways and means at hand to close the technology gap between itself and the West.

Regards. Liacos_samui
PS Mq, sorry I missed you in California; will try to catch up.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (35404)7/17/1999 7:31:00 AM
From: JohnG  Respond to of 152472
 
Maurice Winn--Thanks for excellent summary.
JohnG