SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DanZ who wrote (2327)7/18/1999 4:52:00 PM
From: Bill Wexler  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 10293
 
<<1. A statement from Bill Wexler that retracts his unsubstantiated allegation that the management of GumTech or Gel Tech is perpetrating a stock promotion fraud.>>

I can't do that, since management is - in fact - perpetrating a stock promotion fraud.

<<2. A statement from Bill Wexler that retracts his unsubstantiated allegation that Zicam is a scam.>>

I can't do that, since there is no direct scientific evidence that supports the claims made by the promoters of Zicam.

<<3. No further allegations that GumTech is perpetrating a stock promotion fraud or that Zicam is a scam without supporting evidence to prove those allegations.>>

This is an interesting tactic made by stock promoters. they turn around and ask, "where is the EVIDENCE of fraud?" It is not up to the skeptic to disprove bizarre or fantastic claims, it is up to the promoters of Zicam to prove the efficacy of Zicam. When someone pops out of the woodwork with claims of oa "homeopathic cure" for the common cold, cancer, arthritis, AIDS, etc. the alarm bells should go off immediately.

<<4. No further misrepresentations concerning GumTech, Gel Tech, their management, their products, or anything else related to their business, especially when presented without supporting evidence.>>

The only people making the misrepresentations and pumping the stock on the back of a phony drug are GUMM management, its promoters and shills.



To: DanZ who wrote (2327)7/19/1999 11:47:00 AM
From: Bob Trocchi  Respond to of 10293
 
Dan...

>>I can't speak for anybody else, but here is what it will take to keep me from posting on this thread:<<

I suspect that there will be a fifth reason that will keep you from posting on this thread (at least the GUMM comments) and that is when the price of GUMM collapses.

I anxiously await the outcome.

Bob T.