Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (45993)	7/18/1999 9:23:00 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

I think reading someone else's diary, notebooks, email, and so forth is trespassing and invasion of privacy. As a lawyer, you can't just go through someone else's private papers without a court order, and then only to the extent that the information in the papers is relevant or may reasonably lead to relevant information. There are those who say that Anne Frank's diary should have been kept private, that her father had no business publishing it. If I knew that she didn't want anyone to read it, I never would have read it. As for the possibility that my husband might read my diaries, go through my chest of drawers, look through my wallet, or anything else like that, I trust that such is unthinkable to him. And if he ever did something like that, I know he'd feel as if he'd done something terribly wrong. And vice versa.