Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (65956)	7/18/1999 10:01:00 PM
From: grok	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573692

RE: <But Intel found the problem, worded out a solution, VERIFIED the solution, and has already begun to implement the solution in order to meet the November launch schedule.> So "November launch schedule" means shipping in PCs in volume in Nov. Right?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (65956)	7/18/1999 11:29:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1573692

Paul - RE: "Also true is the fact that the 600 MHz Coppemine introduction in November WILL BE MET !" Good for Intel, but will 600MHz be enough? If AMD is touting 650MHz in Q3 and 700MHz in Q4, AMD will be two speed grades ahead of Intel. I don't think Intel wants that to happen, but who cares about what Intel doesn't want to happen if they can't get their own products out on time? I have no idea about how fast Intel can raise the MHz, but based on Intel's previous schedule of 600 first and 650 and 667 afterwards, I will be impressed if Intel can come out with the 650 and 667 in their normal quantities at the same time as the 600. But is it even possible for Intel to have the ability to do that when the .18 600 was DELAYED two months to begin with? I am also curious as to how they will position the Cu PIII at the same time as the .25 PIII. Should be interesting.