SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cirruslvr who wrote (65998)7/19/1999 12:04:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573713
 
Cringe - Re: "If AMD is touting 650MHz in Q3 and 700MHz in Q4, AMD will be two speed grades ahead of Intel. "

Think for a moment.

AMD "HOPES" to make a million laughALONs by Q4.

Do you think AMD is going to make a MILLION laughALONs that run at 700 MHz ?

Get real !

Paul



To: Cirruslvr who wrote (65998)7/19/1999 12:53:00 AM
From: SisterMaryElephant  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573713
 
Cirruslvr,

<Good for Intel, but will 600MHz be enough?

If AMD is touting 650MHz in Q3 and 700MHz in Q4, AMD will be two speed grades ahead of Intel.>

Just one question. When you and other AMD posters talk about delivering 650Mhz etc., are you talking "systems"? I may be wrong on this ( correct me if I am, Paul ) but when Paul talks about Intel delivering, he is talking about "systems" in volume. The K6 inventory is proof that building CPU's does not always translate into profits. The infrastructure, from MB's and chipsets to demand and marketing, must all be there as well. Just want to make sure we are comparing apples to apples here.

SK



To: Cirruslvr who wrote (65998)7/19/1999 11:25:00 AM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573713
 
Cirrus - <But is it even possible for Intel to have the ability to do that when the .18 600 was DELAYED two months to begin with?>

.18 wasn't delayed for two months, Coppermine was.

<I am also curious as to how they will position the Cu PIII at the same time as the .25 PIII.>

That isn't that hard to figure, if you think about it.

PB




To: Cirruslvr who wrote (65998)7/19/1999 1:15:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 1573713
 
<I am also curious as to how they will position the Cu PIII at the same time as the .25 PIII.>

Probably by featuring two versions at the same speed:

Pentium III 600 (Katmai 0.25 micron)
Pentium III 600PE (Coppermine 0.18 micron)

Tenchusatsu