SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (46243)7/21/1999 3:07:00 PM
From: coug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Again quickly,

I am basically independent.. Heres how I have come down on recent
issues..

On Health, Education and welfare issues....Liberal side.

On abortion... I am for choice.. Liberal side.

gun control.. Conservative side, except I don't think we need AK-47s or the cops either.

Kosovo.. Conservative side.. I was against it.

Impeachment of Clinton.. I don't think BJ's are Impeachable but I would vote for impeachment for the undeclared brutal war.

Basically, I'm with the constitution... but the "Liberal Press" IMO is an oxymoron..

Thanks for your response.. Coug



To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (46243)7/21/1999 3:45:00 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Excellent point.

The term "liberal" has changed significantly during this century. I generally consider myself a "classic" liberal -- that is, a liberal as the label was usually applied up to about 1960. A believer in individual freedom and responsibility. A beliver in societal responsibility for those unable (not merely unwilling) to care for themselves. A believer in the sanctity of human life. An opponent of militarism and nationalism. Those, IMO, were core values of classic liberalism.

Most of those values have been abandoned or perverted by contemporary "liberals," and some have even been taken over by the "conservative" movement. The lables don't mean what they once did.