SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe Lyddon who wrote (10022)7/23/1999 1:14:00 PM
From: Joe Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 57584
 
DIMD: Looks like they cleaned house for SIII. Fortunately, seems others saw that too. Still revs from Rio kind of disappointing and excuses were annoying. Anyway, its tie to SIII kept it from doing much.



To: Joe Lyddon who wrote (10022)7/23/1999 5:00:00 PM
From: Senicko  Respond to of 57584
 
I am in the U.S. Navy, and I saw unclassified message traffic the other day concerning this hoax, that's just what it is a hoax.

Steve



To: Joe Lyddon who wrote (10022)7/23/1999 8:09:00 PM
From: Rande Is  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 57584
 
Regarding that Email surcharge. . . be careful. . .

Washington D.C. lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to prevent this legislation from becoming law.

This sentence has a funny odor spewing from it. When I read it I immediately skipped down to the bottom to see if there was a point of contact. . . .there was.

This is a very subtle way of getting people to send donations. I don't like it.

There may be such a bill. . . but it does not become a threat unless it has a chance of passing. I can't imagine many representatives putting their careers on the line by being in favor of such a bill.

For that matter, if we were to look at all the crazy bills that have been presented. . . we could find many worth fighting against. . . but if it has no chance of passing. . .why fight?

This letter is NOT about the fight. . . .it is about voluntary donations.

Thanks for sharing though. . . if it were to have a chance, it would be important to us all.

Rande Is



To: Joe Lyddon who wrote (10022)7/25/1999 12:25:00 PM
From: gringodoc  Respond to of 57584
 
>>OT: Subject: Bill 602P (5 cent surcharge on email)<<

One of hundreds of e-mail hoaxes:

Written up at the following site which is a great place to check the veracity of dubious letters before forwarding or posting:

ciac.llnl.gov

other great hoax sites:

ciac.llnl.gov

symantec.com

kumite.com

korova.com