Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Network Associates (NET) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (5568)	7/23/1999 7:06:00 PM
From: AlienTech	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6021

I have not looked so cant say! But I looked at some of the older numbers and it did not make sence unless there was some revenues booked for sales that ended up in the where house. When so many question propped up I just said it aint worth figuring out. 7000 other companies out there and for a lot of them you dont need to do this much digging to make much better returns even from these prices. If I did not really belive a buyout will happen soon I would be out completely. >>I think I will let DBRIAN have my shares. Thank you very much for your insight into this company. I found your posts very informed and thought provoking. Unlike your past lament about listening to your gut, I keep going over how I could have avoided this one. Unfortunatley with the research I did, and information gathered around the company, I think I would have come up with the same buy decision as I did a couple of years ago. Even when the stock was at 65 I was willing to take the SEC risks. I was completely unprepared for a report that in effect INVALIDATED all of my past assumptions. << This was what got me as well. I kept thinking what fat herb was saying was total crap. The shorts set up the SEC as the blind spot so people would not sell out before they had time to short to their hearts content.